Index Gap-and-Go (S&P 500)
M1 Bar Data · In-sample 2017–2022 · Out-of-sample 2022–2026 · spread-only costs, no commission
Buy the S&P 500 CFD at the 09:30 ET open when it gaps up 0.4-0.5% or more over the previous session's close, stop at that close, flat by 15:55 ET, one trade per session. Profitable in every in-sample year 2017-2021 (PF 1.49, +$2,807 on 181 trades); out of sample 2022-2025 it made $111 on 169 trades (PF 1.02).
S&P 500 · Candidate 1
Does not hold upS&P 500 · Candidate 2
Does not hold upStrategy Rules
Backtest Parameters
Methodology
Genetic optimization on the in-sample window with a net-of-costs robustness criterion; parameter-plateau selection (top candidates must have profitable neighborhoods, not just a best pass); out-of-sample window run once per frozen candidate on M1 OHLC bars (index CFDs have no tick feed); verdicts gated on net profit factor, drawdown, and IS-to-OOS retention.
Key Takeaway
The in-sample edge was real on its own data: a pre-registered measurement found +0.15R per trade (t 2.3) before any EA was built, and the backtest reproduced it trade for trade. It did not survive the holdout: the strongest failed gate is out-of-sample profit factor (1.02 against the 1.15 minimum), profit came only from 2022, and the $5-per-side cost stress turns both candidates into losses of $4,578 and $6,645. Large gap-ups stopped continuing after 2022. Index CFDs are modeled spread-only (no commission) with the 0.75-point spread subtracted from every trade; all figures carry the M1-OHLC asterisk because indices have no tick feed.
The exact rules of every strategy we've put on trial, how we tested each one, and what the data showed. 12 case files so far, free with your email.
Disclaimer: Past performance is not indicative of future results. These backtest results are based on historical data with realistic commission assumptions. Real trading involves additional risks including execution delays, variable spreads, and emotional decision-making.
Common questions
Does the Index Gap-and-Go (S&P 500) strategy work?
Buy the S&P 500 CFD at the 09:30 ET open when it gaps up 0.4-0.5% or more over the previous session's close, stop at that close, flat by 15:55 ET, one trade per session. Profitable in every in-sample year 2017-2021 (PF 1.49, +$2,807 on 181 trades); out of sample 2022-2025 it made $111 on 169 trades (PF 1.02). Our verdicts: S&P 500 · Candidate 1: Does not hold up; S&P 500 · Candidate 2: Does not hold up.
What were the out-of-sample results of Index Gap-and-Go (S&P 500)?
Out-of-sample window 2022.01.01 – 2026.01.01, net of costs. S&P 500 · Candidate 1: +$111 net on $10,000 over 169 trades, profit factor 1.016, win rate 52.66%, max drawdown 8.43%, profitable in 1 of 4 calendar years (2022-2025). S&P 500 · Candidate 2: +$397 net on $10,000 over 217 trades, profit factor 1.043, win rate 52.53%, max drawdown 7.74%, profitable in 3 of 4 calendar years (2022-2025).
How much of the Index Gap-and-Go (S&P 500) in-sample edge survived out of sample?
S&P 500 · Candidate 1: in-sample profit factor 1.487, out-of-sample 1.016, so 68% of the in-sample profit factor was retained. S&P 500 · Candidate 2: in-sample profit factor 1.323, out-of-sample 1.043, so 79% of the in-sample profit factor was retained.
What data, period and costs was Index Gap-and-Go (S&P 500) backtested with?
In-Sample Window: 2017.01.01 – 2022.01.01; Out-of-Sample Window: 2022.01.01 – 2026.01.01; Data Source: M1 OHLC bars (index CFDs have no tick feed); Starting Capital: $10,000; Risk per Trade: 1.0% of equity; Commission: None - IC Markets index CFDs are spread-only; a 0.75-point spread is subtracted from every trade; Out-of-sample Runs Consumed: 2.
Why was Index Gap-and-Go (S&P 500) rejected?
The in-sample edge was real on its own data: a pre-registered measurement found +0.15R per trade (t 2.3) before any EA was built, and the backtest reproduced it trade for trade. It did not survive the holdout: the strongest failed gate is out-of-sample profit factor (1.02 against the 1.15 minimum), profit came only from 2022, and the $5-per-side cost stress turns both candidates into losses of $4,578 and $6,645. Large gap-ups stopped continuing after 2022. Index CFDs are modeled spread-only (no commission) with the 0.75-point spread subtracted from every trade; all figures carry the M1-OHLC asterisk because indices have no tick feed.